<p>@keaboo. Binding early decision usually benefits students that are financially well-off with maybe not-so-great application who want and need an “advantage”; single choice early action is a little better but still restricting for those TOP students who may also want to apply to their rivals; non-binding early action that Chicago, MIT, and Caltech use is probably the best of the three. I believe Harvard, Stanford, Yale, and Princeton should go to non-binding early action…</p>
<p>…at one time, Harvard had non-binding early action as well…</p>