<p>Mini: I think that’s the point I was trying to make! </p>
<p>That is, there IS some correlation between enforcement and the number of reported alcohol disciplinary actions, even when the underlying level of drinking is comparable! That’s why I picked Earlham for the example and why it is not surprising that they have more alcohol infractions even though they do not have more drinking.</p>
<p>However, differences in infractions attributable to enforcement appear to be small compared to differences in infractions attributible to significant differences in drinking, i.e. the difference in infractions between Earlham and Swat is small, the differences in infractions between either Earlham/Swat and a known high-binge school is large.</p>