<p>D B E E</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>D B E E</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>I missed one, but judging from the other posters in this thread, that’s actually pretty good.</p>
<p>lthgiang, I -think- the difference between ‘regularity in’ and ‘regularity of’ is that ‘in’ describes voluntary actions while ‘of’ refers to things that uncontrollably happen.</p>
<p>“There is regularity IN his personal grooming.”</p>
<p>“The regularity OF snowstorms in winter is appalling.”</p>
<p>But who talks like that to begin with?! Hehe.</p>
<p>Hmm, now that I reread those two examples, I think the difference seems more along the lines of how the word ‘regularity’ is used in the sentence.</p>
<p>The last one is confusing because it should be in the present tense. Why is it in the past tense? It’s STILL similiar.</p>
<p>yes that’s exactly what I thought, virtuoso_735. Present tense would sound a lot better for the last one.</p>
<p>And I don’t have the explanations, I only have the answers.</p>
<p>wow…3 can actually be A, B, or D if you think about it
rest:
B
E
C</p>
<p>lol, my SAT prep teacher went over this with us yesterday.
the last one is E because the original statement was an illogical comparison.</p>
<p>the eighteenth century architecture HAS to be compared to the architecture of Greek and Rome. the original statement doesn’t make it completely clear that the Greek’s and Rome’s architecture was what was being compared.</p>
<p>it does sound repetitive, but that will always be the right answer.</p>
<p>D
B
E
C</p>
<p>well you see the word “the” seems to be missing from that answer choice so it would not be good english</p>
<p>That’s what I thought… it seemed a bit weird without the “the.”</p>
<p>D
C
E
C</p>
<p>…</p>
<p>What are the answers?</p>
<h1>20 is definitely NOT right…architechture should be refered to in the present tense, as they’re talking about the STYLE, not the actually construction of it. In addition, E maintains no time reference…what period of Greek and Roman architechture? It’s ambigious, and definitely a very poorly written question.</h1>
<p>There would never be anything like this on the SAT.</p>
<p>I got DBEE.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I think 3 is parallelism. D sounded funny.
7 is an idiom. I think it’s “charged with.”
For 15, I thought E sounded right. Not sure of explanation.
For 20, it can be B,C, or D because it should be past tense, i.e. “was”, not “is.” And similar seemed to be a better word than “characteristic” in this case.</p>
<p>But it’s talking about the architecture…presumably, the style can still be seen today, no? There are copies and such. Since it’s talking about the STYLE and not any specific buildings, it could be present tense, and if anything, should be.</p>
<p>There isn’t enough context for that sentence.</p>
<p>True, but I think they wanted you to focus on the fact that it was in the past and hence make it past-tense. But you’re right.
I just went with E because it made sense to me and I presumed they wanted it past-tense.</p>
<p>Seriously man, what are the answers?</p>
<p>Wouldn’t the 2nd question be C, because of parallelism?
would be charged/ would spend</p>