<p>You know, it always make me scratch my head why people would post this stuff. The only conclusion I can reach is they want to harm Fordham and embarrass it. </p>
<p>First of all, Princeton Review is just a bunch of kids, asking random other kids questions and its very UNSCIENTIFIC. Its an opinion poll and nothing more. Its less trustworthy than Forbes (which is horrific) and USNWR (which is bad enough). Sadly, kids read that stuff and believe it.</p>
<p>Fordham’s Rose Hill Cafeteria is not perfect and there was an issue last year that was handled by the Administration. But I have eaten in the “caf” for breakfast lunch and dinner MANY times and whiles its classic cafeteria food, its not even close to being as bad as many spoiled students complain about and the Princeton Review writes about.</p>
<p>Could it be better? Of course. Are other school food plans better? Yes. The manner to get that accomplished is not by harming Fordham here, as Fordham Administrators (except some admissions people creeping around) don’t read these boards. The manner to do it is to go direct to the people in charge in ResLife and Student Services. In fact, I would make an appointment (preferably with a responsible group recognized on campus/club) and ask that they address these problems. You can even email Fr. McShane, SJ, Fordham’s President and ask him to deal with it.</p>
<p>Will that work? Who knows? But blasting Fordham here and sending an ugly message to potential students we WANT to recruit is not helpful.</p>
<p>Every school has problems and no school is perfect. Will this rating push Fordham to make changes? I suspect it will. But please be careful when posting here so recruits dont get the wrong idea. </p>
<p>its cafeteria food. Its not home cooking and never will be.</p>
<p>I tend to agree with AZMOM. It could be the employees who are there, with poor supervision. But I also know that Sodexho has different levels of plans…and perhaps there are some penny pinchers at Fordham, who knows? </p>
<p>Its not perfect, but lets be constructive.</p>