<p>Thanks Luigi for your thorough research and clear answer. Those represent tactics to address strategic needs.</p>
<p>Question? Actually 2:</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Is it true, female candidates no longer merit special recruitment, consideration, or admissions compensation as 2010 noted?</p></li>
<li><p>If this is the case (and this may not be as apparent/obvious as it seems) is there consequently, a gender-blind, or gender-neutral playing field for non-minority candidates, or what does that really mean?</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Has the Supe gone on record about this in any public forum? I guess that’s “3 questions.”</p>