<p>Would NearL do us all a favour and refrain from posting one fallacy after another regarding the SATs, college admissions, and AA. If s/he is so intent on voicing his opinion, then I suggest a thorough understanding of the subject being discussed. </p>
<p>The SATs are viewed as intelligence tests. The direct correlation to direct intelligence or g, is in question. Though many psychometricians do believe it is a reliable test. As for undergrad performance, the SATs are by far the most reliable and reproducible test on how well students will do during the undergrad years. The higher the score, the higher the likelihood that they will do quite well. Please, anyone interested in giving exceptions to this highly reproducible rule, don’t bother.</p>