Accepted... now what?

<p>

</p>

<p>The Oregon study, “Data Mining the University: College GPA Predictions from SAT Scores,” looked at upper-division, within-major GPA and found that “the best predictor of GPA is a roughly equally weighted sum of SAT and high school GPA, measured in standard deviation units.” Of course there are selection problems inherent in such studies (matriculants are a selected sample), but the impact of selection is ambiguous. </p>

<p>Here is the abstract from another study: </p>

<p>

<a href=“http://education.ucsb.edu/rzwick/3185_02_Zwick.pdf[/url]”>http://education.ucsb.edu/rzwick/3185_02_Zwick.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>GPA is such a deficient measure of performance that it is not clear why we obsess over it anyway. Even if it is a good ordinal measure (i.e., it ranks students appropriately), it may not be a good cardinal measure (i.e., the absolute level of GPA may not be meaningful), yet the GPA is typically used in regressions. In addition, there are many factors affecting GPA that not directly related to education. Students who pick their classes and teachers to maximize GPA in HS will do the same in college. Students who ingratiate themselves to teachers in HS will do the same in college. Students whose aim in HS is to maximize GPA rather than learn will have the same aim in college. Nonetheless, these two studies hardly suggest that the SAT is irrelevant as a predictor of GPA or graduation rates.</p>