<p>I was just trying to explain to people who never had problems due to achievement (and took Cobrat’s never ending list of friends-who as proof it couldn’t be true 
in a rather ironic turn of events) or who thought 1690 was too low to be #1 or that the posts weren’t well-written enough to justify a high ranking, that yes one can be bullied by lower-achieving peers because one is higher-achieving, even if that achievement is relative; and providing context for what relative achievements are (on a forum where one forgets that 1500 combined is the official “average”). Even poorly-worded posts aren’t indicative of much depending on the school. So this in itself wasn’t a sign OP was lying, fudging, or being a ■■■■■.
I still think that if we encounter a not very articulate kid poster with above-average but not stellar stats on this forum, we can’t assume s/he is lying.</p>
<p>However the end of this thread makes me think that indeed OP was a ■■■■■, or even using CC for a more nefarious purpose (such as planning to cheat or planning to accuse someone). We should have heard back that the matter was resolved to Op’s benefit if OP had been telling the truth.</p>