<p>
</p>
<p>Thumper, the subsidy amount is set on the basis of the 2nd lowest silver plan in the region (assuming there are at least 2 to choose from) – that is the benchmark used to set the tax credit. But the person has the option to apply that same credit to any plan they choose.</p>
<p>So here is an example, involving a hypothetical 32 year old individual with a $34,000 income, living in San Francisco:</p>
<p>Benchmark Silver plan is Anthem Blue Cross.
Full cost premium is $349/month.
Subsidy is $83- which reduces the premium to $266. ($266/month is roughly 9.4% of annual income).</p>
<p>That person could opt to buy a Bronze policy from Anthem instead, with a premium of $261 a month – the $83 subsidy is portable, so it can be applied to reduce the Bronze cost to $178. It’s the difference between a $2000 and $5000 deductible, but the annual savings is $1,056 – so it might be worth the risk for someone who doesn’t expect to even meet the $2k deductible. </p>
<p>On the other hand, let’s say that the person does want Silver, but would prefer to have Kaiser. Kaiser’s full cost silver premium is $358 ($9 more than Anthem) – so that same $83 can be applied and the monthly premium would be $275.</p>
<p>The person could opt for Silver or Platinum as well. That doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense for someone with modest earnings, but it could be worthwhile to eliminate the deductible for someone who has a chronic condition that requires prescription medication and frequent doctor visits for monitoring. Blue Shield has a Gold policy available for $412 a month – with the $83 subsidy, that will be $329/month. Gold policies in California have no deductibles and a $19 copay for generic medication, $30 copay for routine doctor visits. The person is paying $63 more each monthly premiums, but getting the benefit of the copay and prescription drug benefits from day 1 - if those routine costs would run more than about $750 a year, then the person is probably better off with the Gold plan. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if the income was $28,000 instead of $34,000, the person would be eligible for what California calls an “Enhanced Silver 73” plan (meaning that the plan is the actuarial equivalent of the insurance paying 73% rather than 70% of all costs) - and a monthly subsidy of $183. The person is earning $6,000 less per year, but subsidy is only $1,200 more – so not particularly beneficial – but the “Enhanced” Silver plan has a $1500 deductible rather than $2,000. So the math to compare plans is a little bit different.</p>