<p>That’s exactly the problem I’m having with agnosticism. When confronted with the possibility of a god, agnostics dismiss the argument as inherently flawed because it is impossible to prove a deity doesn’t exist when addressing the supernatural qualities attributed to it. This is only valid in an isolated discussion. Let’s introduce fairies and leprechauns into the equation. Now, doing so in past discussions has been deemed offensive and arbitrary. They dismiss the idea as ridiculous and it is, but what separates the validity of theism from fairy-ism or leprechaun-ism? Agnostics will straddle the theist/atheist fence halfway, yet when confronted with other supernatural beings, the range of possibility goes from 50% to 0%. </p>
<p>I’d like then to post another question to agnostics:
Are you agnostic about all manner of supernatural beings?</p>