<p>You’re surprised that I think I’m smarter than you after you began your side of the discussion by assuming I didn’t know what agnosticism was?</p>
<p>In what way did I put forth a straw man argument? You have failed to put forth a single original argument and act like quoting Huxley and proceeding with ad hominem is something special, both of which have absolutely nothing to do with the original question. Everyone knows what it means to be an agnostic, the purpose of this thread is to gauge the “why”, the psyche of the agnostic. Is it a philosophical position on par with epistemological nihilism? </p>
<p>If all you have to offer are Huxley quotes don’t even bother, not to mention they’re completely irrelevant to the purpose of the thread.</p>