<p>As Consolation said, the facilities Barnard shares with Columbia are not counted at all, and they are extensive. The campus is only 4 acres so there is very little to maintain. TheMet ( both of them), Broadway, The Museum of Natural History, Columbia’s Butler Library, the New York Historical Society, the New York City Public Library, South Street Seaport, Wall Street were all learning sites for Barnard Classes without any cost to B to maintain. The Ballet and Lincoln Center Library, the New York Appeals Court and MOMA were too, come to think of it.</p>
<p>Sorry for being so defensive, but Consilation nudged me to put this figure into perspective. Oh Barnard women can also study free of charge at Julluard and Manhattan School if they qualify.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t say that B offers more than W or S (or BM or MHC for that matter) just other things not reflected in endowment figures.</p>
<p>I find the title and implications of it troubling.</p>
<p>Barnard was begged to merge with Columbia but refused. Admissions rate was 21% this year.</p>
<p>As for death of colleges, I taught at Southampton College, a lovely school on eastern LI. It began as an independent school, was Incorporated into LIU and eventually by Stony Brook, but no one could make a go of it even though funds were poured in. I mourn it’s demise. Who wouldn’t love going to the Hamptons every day? It’s Latin dept. ended up at my S’s high school. What I conclude from this is that it’s an economically hard time for higher Ed. Attraction of students was not the problem.</p>
<p>Women’s colleges will stay in demand as ore and more women are edged our of seats as co-Ed institutions try to keep some kind of parity between sexes and women in college increasingly out number men. Many women will choose between schools lower on the feeding scale and all women’s institutions. (My D preferred Barnard to schools of equal rigor so I am not saying that is the only reason for the choice.)</p>
<p>As for the red herring of lesbianism, I find the cooments misplaced. One in ten people is gay, equal to Smith’s number. The reason men’s numbers are higher is that women are more likely to self-identify as bi for many reasons. Good for Smith and the other women’s colleges mentioned in this connection that women are free to be themselves in public. Brava.</p>