Wanted to weigh in on several points raised while I was asleep here on the other side of the world.
I think country-wide fraternity party boycott is a brilliant idea (@Someoldguy beat me to the Lysistrata reference), but the reasons given by the National conference just seemed to muddy the waters by being over-protective and condescending. I wasn’t in a sorority and I’m not a fan of Greek systems in general, so I’m probably not the best person to comment here, but I think this kind of restriction infantilizes college women, at exactly the time that they need to be empowered to make good decisions.
I accept that over the years the police have not distinguished themselves for sensitivity in handling sexual assault cases, but for sure that situation has improved and continues to improve as attention is drawn to it. I’d like to see the Justice Department set up a task force to encourage collaboration between colleges and their local precincts. To me, this makes a lot more sense and has more long term application than allowing the Department of Education to mandate how colleges adjudicate the same cases internally.
The first step would be to set up an environment that would help young women feel comfortable discussing the details of their complaints. Of course, they’ll have to answer difficult questions, but the sooner the situation is addressed the better. This is where victim advocates and college support counselors could be of great value. I’ll have to read the Rebecca Campbell article later in the day, but for sure, there are a lot of people with good ideas out there. I think the same way that progress has been made in cases involving domestic violence and child abuse are handled, progress in handling sexual assault cases isn’t unthinkable, especially if the focus is narrowed to campus sexual assault.
I’m not entirely clear how far the police are able to proceed in investigation without getting a commitment from the victim. I understand that the police can investigate whatever and whomever they want, but I can’t understand how encouraging (not pressuring) the victim to press charges could be anything but a positive step toward getting an arrest and conviction.
I’m glad that the former Vanderbilt students were convicted and that their victim participated forcefully in the trial. This case was exceptional because of the availability of evidence documented by the perpetrators themselves. I’m not sure,though, that the victim was originally willing to press charges. Obviously, at some point, she got good and mad, and her participation was a key element, I think, reaching in the conviction.
I think the Duke Alpha Delta Phi case (the “roofie” case) will also be an opportunity for the victim, college, police and court to collaborate and set a precedent for doing the right thing. If the proceedings are fair and transparent and the victim feels she is treated with sensitivity and respect, I think the legal system could take a step forward in credibility.
The trial of former Duke student Lewis McLeod will begin on February 16 in Durham County. If it proceeds, I think the outcome of this trial will be a benchmark on how college OCR mandated sexual misconduct committees handle he-said/she-said cases going forward. I understand that the financial impact of settling cases may be minimal, but I think the PR and policy impact will be significant.
