<p>
</p>
<p>Well, with Inkster, in the heart of western Wayne County, I’d say it’s a good bet the speech pattern is Appalachian. Southfield it’s harder to say. Back in the day when I spent a lot of time in southeast Michigan, Southfield was largely Jewish; now I understand it’s largely black, but there may have been a phase when it was partly Appalachian, I don’t know.</p>
<p>Linguist William Labov identifies Michigan, and especially Detroit, as the epicenter of the Northern Cities Vowel Shift which extends from western New York State through Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, and up through Milwaukee. But that theory says the shift would have the vowel in “cat” pronounced a little more more like the vowel in “bit”. Not “cait.” Though I think you’d hear it more in a word like “that” pronounced as a clipped “thit.”</p>
<p>In Appalachian English, you’d hear two things: first, an elongation and “breaking” of certain vowels, so “red” come out more like “rey-ud.” And second, a shift almost opposite of the Northern Cities shift, so “bat” comes out more like “beyt.” Or, combining the two “bey-ut.” Which is pretty close to what hugcheck remembers hearing, “cait” (or “cay-ut” ) for “cat”. Or “they-ut” for “that.”</p>
<p>And it’s not implausible that you could have heard similar sounds in upstate New York, where the Northern Cities Vowel Shift pretty much hugs the Great Lakes shoreline; just south of there, in New York State’s Southern Tier, is the northern extension of Appalachia, and lots of people migrate from the Southern Tier to Buffalo, Rochester, and Syracuse, </p>
<p>Thing is, the Appalachian shift (an elongated “they-ut” for “that”) is pretty much just the opposite to the Northern Cities Vowel Shift (a clipped “thit” for “that”), so to a deep Michigander, an Appalachian accent sticks out like a sore thumb. Not to say they aren’t among us.</p>