<p>So much to catch up on:</p>
<p>
Bingo.
Bingo.
Mega-Bingo.
Mega-Bingo.
Right. It’s not exactly “headlined” when it’s discussed in paragraph 24 of a 27-paragraph post.
I had been hesitant to mention this lest I be accused of being needlessly provocative but I am more familiar than this incident than I want to be, in graphic detail. I think the prospect, who now attends Wellesley, overreacted. Her father afterwards was kind enough to send my D the Smith sweatshirt and other items his D had purchased with an intent to attend Smith. The student who “crossed the line”, egregiously and obnoxiously, was seriously disciplined; due to privacy concerns, I can not be certain but I believe the student was expelled. As the cards fell, this came up in a discussion I had with an admissions officer, which then expanded to include the issue of “comfort zones” and such–so cavalierly dismissed by some as being a non-existent issue–and how prospects and student vary in their responses. As I said, personally I think the offended person–who had just cause to be offended for sure–overreacted…a similar experience could have happened at a co-ed school and nobody would write the school off…and that was what was behind my comment in the OP about Smith, unwanted advances, and implicit comparison to a co-ed school.
Abso-effing-lutely.
By contesting reality, some people wind up putting a far greater emphasis, via weight of posts, than is otherwise warranted. Shutting one’s eyes and insisting “but it doesn’t exist, it doesn’t exist” is not helpful and is not only a deceitful act of omission, as others have noted, but makes it seem that the “large shadow” cast by the community would be a problem.
Two things, BJM. First, Smith is a lot more “out there” in terms of LBGT presence, Wellesely is more buttoned down, more, urr, undercover. This is fact. Everyone needs to deal. It is <em>not</em> a “problem,” as anyone who has read my posts over the years would indicate. Second, the Wellesley board doesn’t have anyone running around like Butterfly McQueen in “Gone With The Wind” every time Yankees, I mean gays, make an appearance. Smith has a large gay community, probably the largest of any college: FACT. This community casts a large shadow in many dimensions: FACT. It’s not a problem: my OPINION.
It is laughable to think that there isn’t whispering rumor out there in the universe already. Personally, I find it deplorable that as soon as a reader reads–or a listener hears–the words “gay/lesbian” that it catches the imagination. But the best way to deal with those imagination is with matter-of-fact reality-based information and accounts of experience. My rule of thumb has been that 1/3 of Smith is gay…given that the recent survey of 1,500 students showed that identifying as “straight” varied by class from 55 to 70 percent, I’ll stick by my rule of thumb as being reasonably accurate as to what a perception of someone living in that community is going to have. There are parents–or students–who, if they see or hear that stat, are never going to set foot on the campus. Those aren’t “lost” students, those are students who were never Smith’s to begin with. But there are students and parents in the middle of the continuum for whom a “yes, here are the demographics, yes, the gay/bi culture is a major fact of life on campus, and no, in our experience from the straight side of things, it’s not a problem” conversation is extremely useful, as Jyber’s experience in talking to prospect families indicates as well as my own.
Thanks, Laurel. It’s nice to get some collaboration from another current student, other than from my own D, that as “only a parent,” I’ve got a pretty good handle on Smith. Lord knows, I try.
[quote]
I am straight, but was on the recieving end of a few advances from gay women this year, especially at the beginning of the year when my sexual orientation was probably unknown. I did not find it disrespectful or discourteous and while the advances were “unwanted” I didn’t expect the other person to automatically know that. In fact, because it was never discourteous or the least bit threatening, I found it somewhat flattering. One unwanted advance certainly does not rise to the level of “sexual harrasment”, particularly if the person makes no further advances after being told that the attention is not welcome.
[quote]
What I’ve heard is that it takes a while for people to figure out which side of the plate [my idiom] other people hit from and that there’s sometimes some awkwardness and confusion until things sort out. Which can be momentarily “uncomfortable” for some, which is, as you indicate, a far cry from “harrassment”–a word I never used…I don’t appreciate my words being twisted to frame a strawman argument.
Mega-Bingo.
LOL. Done!!! Contrary to what some might think, I only cite what I have fairly closehand accounts of. I hadn’t been aware of the jazz band.
Ain’t that the truth. What my D doesn’t tell me won’t hurt me, or something like that. Fortunately, I’ve cultivated multiple sources over the years…so, like, I can maybe paint 10 percent of certain pictures of things Parents Aren’t Supposed to Know. D has been surprised at how much knowledge I’d accumulated about traditions at various Houses.</p>