<p>lol. Didn’t know we had a “cultural fear” of math. My own kids took calc 1 in 11th grade and plenty of advance math afterwards. Still wondering where this notion comes from. Certainly, some math classes were taught better than others. In those weak years, we as parents filled in the void. My kids chose engineering (among other reasons) because it was the most rigorous math/physics/science they could get as undergrads. </p>
<p>Regarding the idea that the US is in a post-engineering phase, I have to wonder if this applies more to the type of engineering than engineering in general.</p>
<p>I have never taken a math class beyond algebra II and statistics, and never once have any of my employers cared - or even asked.</p>
<p>Some people are stronger at some things than others, and I don’t believe it’s helpful to criticize students for picking an educational path that connects with their skills and interests. If that involves math, great. If not, great.</p>
<p>Engineering is cyclic. Different forms of engineering have different demand curves and different utility decay rates. There are times when it is superb to be a xxxx engineer and other times when you can’t find a job with a xxxx degree. Nonetheless, it is a degree with a high probability of employment upon graduation and a career beyond it. There is the added complication that comes with age - higher levels of compensation and technological obsolesce. Older engineers are therefore at risk if they don’t maintain the cutting edge competence.</p>
<p>Not all liberal arts are low cost to deliver. Biology is an extremely popular major at some schools, but it is a high cost major, since it requires substantial numbers of lab courses that are more costly to the school than lecture and discussion courses (like humanities, social studies, business, and math).</p>
<p>“Older engineers are therefore at risk if they don’t maintain the cutting edge competence.”</p>
<p>This is very heavily dependent upon the company they work for. If the company is not involved in extremely current and emerging businesses and technologies, their employees will also not be. Most people will stay current with what their company is doing at the moment but trying to stay ahead is guesswork and may lead you into subjects of no value.</p>
<p>I agree that the employer may help accelerate the engineer’s obsolesce thereby truncating his/her career alternatives. Unfortunately, this clearly puts the responsibility on the engineer to maintain his/her skills and knowledge.</p>
<p>Talking about “fear of math” and student demand for engineering degrees, ** Table A4.4 ** in one of the OECD report’s [data sheets](<a href=“http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/1/48630719.pdf”>http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/62/1/48630719.pdf</a>) actually seems to show that the percentage of students enrolled in engineering/manufacturing degree courses at the tertiary-type A and advanced research levels in the United States in the reference year 2009 was actually the ** lowest ** among all OECD countries. </p>
<p>The table, however, also shows an unusually high percentage of US-based students enrolled in “not known or unspecified” fields, suggesting there may be some problem in data collection as far as the US is concerned. In other words, I can’t tell how reliable those enrollment percentages are.</p>
<p>I know this is only one case but my son falls into this “unspecified” class since he hasn’t declared a major going into college. He won’t have to do so until the end of his sophmore year. He didn’t declare because he is not yet sure if he wants computer science or math. I assume he is not alone. Cases like his will impact the numbers. He loves math.</p>
<p>I love this thread. It’s like, WHY CAN’T WE ALL JUST LEARN MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS AND BE HAPPY?!!!</p>
<p>Dear Concerned Middle Class Fathers,</p>
<p>Math is great, but nobody cares. This hysteria about STEM majors is just that: people think that by satisfying some arcane list of requirements, they will purify themselves before the nebulous ether and gaim entry to heaven on earth. Before, people used to buy great artwork for the churches in order to buy out their souls, and even before that, they did rain dances and sacrificed virgins. Now everybody’s advised to put themselves through the Majors of Hell, for a propensity for the humanities is Original Sin, and only linear algebra could possibly save you from the inferno/not being decent enough to enter the middle class.</p>
<p>But the fact is, the world was always as it is right now, in the sense that, to succeed, one must hustle. A piece of paper, whether it says that you go to confession regularly or that you completed pre-med requirements, will not save your ass unless in a bathroom situation. Unfortunately, there is no substitute for hard work, and there is no medicine for uncertainty.</p>
<p>p.s. Multivariable calculus is pretty legit, tho</p>
<p>^Eloquent and insightful wit like that, in my opinion, is more marketable than being a dime-a-dozen dullard whose resume is distinguished by containing a line saying ‘Multivariable Calculus.’</p>
<p>The value I see in having quantitative credentials is that you have the skill set to think critically about data instead of relying only on a computer output or the analysis which someone else puts on your desk/computer screen. I’m looking to go into International Relations, but I hope to distinguish myself by having taken a statistics course, perhaps working in some econometrics, and taking a course in Geographical Information Systems. I figure I’ll be better able to do whatever job I end up with if I’m able to come to an understanding of inputs on my own.</p>