<p>lol “No omit option” “d) a”
I think you answered your own question there</p>
<p>How about the aquafarming one, where it asked if a sentence about how it keeps prices low for consumers needed to be shortened? I put no…</p>
<p>What about number 3 on the test? it was asking about (“contribution’s of African Americans”) and it asked you whether to take out the apostrophe in contribtutions. Were you suppose to leave it in?</p>
<p>Nah, it’s just contributions</p>
<p>so was the answer to the first question acknowledge?</p>
<p>what was the one where it was talking about like the train stopping for food and the underlined part said “One day all of a sudden” i put no change for that one</p>
<p>I believe it was no change. The other choices didn’t make sense.</p>
<p>I guessed on one of the last questions for English. It was either 72 or 73 and it asked something about the paragraph and might have mentioned shrimp and the environment. I answered J. lol hopefully this is clear enough for someone to answer.</p>
<p>@SY: I chose the answer that changed it to “As railway use increased” or something. The question asked “What would be the best introduction to the sentence in order to emphasize how the new restaurants were in response to the railroad” or something like that.</p>
<p>I think thats what it was, but I can’t really remember.</p>
<p>@nehccire Didn’t it pertain to horses as well?</p>
<p>@nehccire You are correct. It asked about a possible explanation for the appearance of eating houses. “As railway use increased” is the only option that included an explanation.</p>
<p>@skylimits Whaa? I thought it had something to do with the spontaneous appearances of horses? Eating houses?</p>
<p>This was the passage about Fred Harvey and his eating houses on the Santa Fe railway. I don’t think horses had anything to do with it.</p>
<p>it was eating houses, the whole paragraph went on to talk about the dinners. i also got as railway use increased, definitely right</p>
<p>anyone rember pattern of afafaf in kinda middle</p>