<p>2 and 5…though I was REALLY pressed for time and didn’t do 5 the justice it deserved. and i was kind of vague on 2…</p>
<p>2 and 4. 2 sucked horribly, but I had just read an essay about part of 4, and my 4 was awesome.</p>
<p>i hope i get a 4</p>
<p>3 and 4.
WHo would choose 2? There’s nothing to write about it.</p>
<p>3 was godsent
5 was … unpleasant since i decided to stop listening in class about that topic. although i knew some stuff, i kinda bsed it</p>
<p>2/5 rocked!!!</p>
<p>I chose 2. There was a lot to say about 2.
actually come to think about it I wrote 3. sorry.lol</p>
<p>3,4</p>
<p>OBVIOUSLY the best choices. 
IMO, of course.</p>
<p>3 and 4 i didn’t get why more peeps at my school didn’t do that… probably cuz i paid attention until appx 1860 then i just spaced out the rest of the year 
most likely why i found 5 so hard…</p>
<p>2 i didn’t really anything about that specific portion of the topic
3 was easy as heck
4 was kinda tricky but i pulled it off
5 i didn’t know crap.</p>
<p>i didn’t even read 3. but 2 is the colonial essay, and i had v. little time, and the colonial essays get curved a bunch, so im hedging my bets on that.</p>
<p>2/5 was so easy. Easier, at least.</p>
<p>For number 3, i literally know NOTHING on the topic. I get all the things from that time period convoluted and confused.</p>
<h1>2 was extremely easy - I had a LOT of facts supported by some good trends.</h1>
<p>I did 3 and 4 because …
3) I already wrote an essay on this one
4) Our school just had speaker about something related to my thesis.</p>
<p>I could have done 2 too. Actually, the question for my firs tever ap us test was number 2…it would have been like coming full circle if I answered it.
All and all. I was luck</p>
<p>3 and 5
I really thought those were the EASIEST</p>
<p>2 and 4 were both too…ugh. I just didn’t feel like thinking that hard.</p>
<p>3 and 5 …
I thought I was so screwed when I saw 4 and 5…but I managed to do decently on 5 which was good.
3 was pretty easy…though…the time period they gave was sort of limited for the issue they chose…I dunno…I didn’t quite understand the question but yeah…it was ok…</p>
<p>I’m never too sure about how I did on essays…</p>
<p>3 and 4 woot woot
2 was crap–how do you work with 2 paragraphs and 1 cause leads to answer
5 was really vague–there was no focus to the isms you were suppose to talk about
the DBQ was sweet so easy</p>
<p>3 and 5 </p>
<p>Those two lent themselves to the most writing and buzz words.</p>
<p>3 and 4. I wrote 4 extra pages because the free response booklet didn’t have enough pages. I know length doesn’t mean quality, but still more confident about free response than M/C.</p>
<p>Yup… 1,3,5</p>
<p>Everyone at my school did 3 and 5… but 3 was still hard… I had to write 2 complete pages of BS on 3.</p>
<p>I did them out of order, like 1,5,3 instead of 1,3,5. Do you think it’s okay? I did circle everything on top of the page though… I hope it’s alright</p>
<p>I did 2 and 4. I had studied a TON for 2 so that was simple, I had a ready arsenal of good facts and I know those two parts sooo well. 3 was hard for me, I barely studied that at all, not my favorite time period. I had written the 2001 essay on almost the exact same thing as 4 and discussed it with my teacher so I chose that since I was running out of time (20 minutes) and I could just regurgitate it for the most part. I didn’t study the 5 time period much at all, didn’t read the chapters in my book and it was way too vague so it was an easy choice. I’m just really glad they weren’t too bad and besides 4, I actually didn’t mind writing about those two topics.</p>
<p>2 and 5. 3 and 4 were both doable for me too, but I went with what I thought would be easiest.</p>