<p>I pointed out that I was making that assumption in my last post. The last paragraph of your article:</p>
<p>“Susan Traiman of the Business Roundtable criticizes the new study, saying that it gives an illusion of a robust supply because it bundles all STEM fields together. There may be an oversupply in the life sciences and social sciences, she argues, but there is no question that there are SHORTAGES IN ENGINEERING and the physical sciences. The findings “are not going to make us go back and re-examine everything we’ve been been calling for,” she says.”</p>
<p>You said 3 times too many engineering graduates. Your article never says that as it claims to be grouping all STEM majors.</p>