<p>that’s a deliberately misleading statement (“troubles with the law,” “prosecuted,” “discriminatory practices”). what happened, for those not in the know, is a female student sued one of the few (3 of 13) clubs that, at the time, remained all-male, to force it to open its doors to women (this, despite being a private organization with associational rights). your statement seems to suggest that the government prosecuted all the clubs for some more insidious practice. the opinion in the case states that ALL single-sex organizations, including fraternities and sororities, could be “de-segregated” (your words) under the law, if only someone sued them. assuming a counterpart exists on the massachusetts books, harvard’s (still) all-male final clubs could suffer that fate. care to take the case, counselor?</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.mccarterhiggins.com/LOOKBEFOREYOULEAP.htm[/url]”>http://www.mccarterhiggins.com/LOOKBEFOREYOULEAP.htm</a></p>