<p>What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?</p>
<p>war, what is it good for?</p>
<p>why does my gender say one?</p>
<p>what the hell! why wud ur Gender say 1?! 
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>My Gender says 2. Apparently there is some sort of a glitch or bug in the system that is changing some peoples Gender field to numbers. Hopefully the CC powers that be (read: Administrators) will fix the issue sometime soon.</p>
<p>alrite! beat me w/ DAT gender! lol! I just checked all the boxes and it gave me 31! lol!</p>
<p>ik, what role does one’s gender play in gaining acceptance and approval in the workforce as well as the general society?</p>
<p>Ok I think I understand exogenous/endogenous. Endogenous factors influence on “the model” and affects it’s outcome from within, while exogenous work to exacerbate the endogenous factors by providing reactions from people outside of the model. like, conventional wisdom or steretypes. i don’t know if that’s clear…but you’ll probably get the idea.</p>
<p>What is your SAT score?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>haha, google provides result for european swallow. african swallow im not sure, it’s the fastest speed in simcity 2000 ^_^</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>annihilating the status quo</p>
<p>and it does a pretty good job at it. </p>
<p>it also often provides a breeding ground for new ideas and technologies (though the process obviously tries to censor some ideas in the process)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>depends on the society and the attitudes held by people within society. nowadays it’s less of a factor in approval in the workforce, but there is still discrimination, and will always likely be. gender-blindness is impossible for the fact that child-rearing must be taken into account. and there are differences in averages and variation between males and females in certain parameters (physical strength, time it takes for people to mature, arguably variance in intelligence, work ethic)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Exogenous factors often influence the situation independently of endogenous factors. It’s just that oftentimes exogenous factors have an influence on the endogenous factors. In this case, the endogenous factors in the situation are still classified as endogenous, even if under exogenous influences. I just wrote something on how our definitions are not perfect.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I got 1330 in 9th grade but never took it after 9th grade (entered college early)</p>
<p>How early did you enter college?</p>
<p>right after 10th grade</p>
<p>are you gay?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>wrong answer.</p>
<p>the answer is: [absolutely nothing.](<a href=“XS4ALL - First Class Internet”>http://www.xs4all.nl/~maroen/engels/lyrics/war.htm</a> )</p>
<p>May I have a peanut?</p>
<p>Anyways, concerning the endogenous/exogenous distinction…</p>
<p>“The total derivative of a function of several variables, with respect to one of its variables, is, in contrast to the partial derivative, a derivative which takes into account indirect dependencies, i.e., the fact that the other variables may depend upon the given variable. For example, the total derivative of f(x,y,z) with respect to x is”</p>
<h1><a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_derivative[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_derivative</a></h1>
<p>Similarly, the exogenous/endogenous distinction often doesn’t account for indirect dependencies. After all, what do we categorize endogenous variables with exogenous indirect dependencies as? Endogenous, it seems most of the time. Hm</p>
<p>Who let the dogs out?</p>
<p>Is “Endogeny” a current word? Like, would it be found in most recently published dictionaries?</p>
<p>apparently so
<a href=“http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?endogeny[/url]”>http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?endogeny</a>
<a href=“http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/dictionaries/difficultwords/data/d0005104.html[/url]”>http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/dictionaries/difficultwords/data/d0005104.html</a></p>
<h2>A 2000 meter (to the nearest meter) length of optical fiber cable has a radius of 3.45*10^-5 meters. Find the volume of the cable.</h2>
<p>Ok so I’ve got .000345.</p>
<p>Now if I want to find the volume of the sphere(is it a sphere?) then I just do 4/3<em>pi</em>radius^2 … right? </p>
<p>but then how does the 2000m play in?</p>