<p>BigGreen,</p>
<p>I’ll bet that many people can really see both sides of this issue. I believe that USNA implemented a similar policy a few years ago and a goal may be to become more competitive. </p>
<p>If any college wants to compete in the glamour sports (football and basketball) at the Division I level, they have to recruit the quality athletes who are being recruited by other Division I colleges. Could the service academies compete at the DIII level? Sure, but then I think there would be quite a few people who would protest such a decision and messing with tradition.</p>
<p>Should these athletes be responsible for completing their commitment to serve? Absolutely! Somehow - either in years of service or paying back the financial obligation ($250k?).</p>
<p>I also think many of the candidates who WP can now compete for will still not be interested in the cadet lifestyle. But, if they look for the right athlete/scholars they may find some terrific future officers. </p>
<p>Another questions they may have considered: How will it improve morale for current cadets to have winning teams (if it actually works - sure hope so)? How will alumni react? Will more donations come in for the new rugby field? Will they be able to fund additional sports? The new tv deal should help.</p>
<p>Fair? Probably not, but it may be the best compromise they could construct.</p>
<p>Fabulous and topical discussion. I predict heated debate. Go Army!</p>