<p>Logicalidea:</p>
<p>You think the current administration is bad. Why would giving them a more rigid report rectify the ongoing injustice, and not potentially lead to greater injustice in the future?</p>
<p>My key contention is: I don’t think revising the report will rectify the ongoing injustice. In fact, I think, given the track record you’ve outlined for the administration, giving them a more rigid set of rules could only increase injustice in the future. The problem lies with the discretion of the administration, not the guiding principles. </p>
<p>Why would a more inflexible doctrine rectify an administration that has shown bad judgment in the past? Such a doctrine could, in fact, allow the administration to amplify the ongoing injustice, especially as they’ve shown the propensity to interpreting moderate language in an extremist way. </p>
<p>I worry about giving more extreme language over to extremists.</p>