Banning books in high schools

<p>I understand that people may assume that Harry Potter and The Witches glorify magic, but the magic in them is not the main focus of the stories. In the case of Harry Potter, it’s the classic boarding school story with a twist. The evil characters get punished, the bullied orphan saves the day. That’s it. Same happens in The Witches - except that magic is not at all glorified, and those who practice it are portrayed as evil.</p>

<p>The Handmaid’s Tale is set in a dystopian future in which women are treated as a form of property by religious fundamentalists for the reason that they can bear children. Yes, that may cast a shadow over the history of the LDS Church. That is no reason to ban it. Unless we face up to the fact that we have ugly pasts and have committed acts that are deemed unacceptable by the majority of the population today, we will never move forward as a people. It’s for this reason that we do not ban books about slavery and Nazism. Similarly, it is for this reason that we cannot justifiably ban a book that protests against sexism and religious fundamentalism.</p>

<p>But Laylah, we do ban books about Nazism, e.g. The Diary of Anne Frank.</p>

<p>what school district bans the diary of anne frank…</p>

<p>maybe in elementary or middle school but definitely not in high school. diary of anne frank is required by many many world history/us history classes around the nation</p>

<p>Here’s a standard statement, in just about every article that lists banned books, “The Diary of Anne Frank was determined to be “a real downer” by the Alabama Textbook Commission in a 1983 attempt to ban the book in all school libraries in that state.” They also complained about its “sexually offensive passages.” So, you’re right–the book was never actually banned, but it still shows up on these lists and in displays of banned books.</p>

<p>Its so sad what the “Christian” right is doing to America. I am an elder in our church and consider myself a faithful believer but I am not so narrow-minded as to suggest banning book of the calibre on the OP list. Great literature should honestly reflect our world and many in it are profane. To pretend it doesn’t exist is folly.</p>

<p>And the simplemindedness which the leaders of the Christian right exhibit is dumbfounding. No prayer in schools? Hogwash! We encourage our son to pray anywhere, anytime, for any reason. And when he has prayed in school nobody can stop him. What they want is for teachers, coaches and administrators to lead their students in prayer to God. Would they be okay if a Muslim teacher was to invoke Allah in prayer? I think not!! And BTW, YHWH, God and Allah are the same God if one has read the Qura’an, the Torah and the Holy Bible.</p>

<p>I didn’t know The Diary of Anne Frank had also been challenged. :frowning: This depresses me. At the risk of coming across as being overly obsessive about this, I do honestly believe that censoring literature is a terrible idea - particularly when, as is the case with The Diary of Anne Frank, it is the memoirs of a person who was alive during such an important period in our history.</p>

<p>By censoring such literature, surely we risk losing the ‘human element’ when we study history - by that I mean the emotions, fears, and loves of the people who were alive then - and instead restrict ourselves to blank statistics and rote memorization of dates?</p>

<p>Why was it censored?? What is wrong with The D of AF?</p>

<p>I can’t see how anyone could ban a book that good</p>

<p>I know this has nothing to do with banning books but while we are at it, do Anne, Margot, and their mother have graves?? Did the liberators dig up some of the mass graves and bury the dead in separate graves or try to identify some of them after the war??</p>

<p>I believe Anne and Margot are buried in a joint grave at Bergen-Belsen.</p>

<p>This may be related to this thread–do high schools that show certain films(holocaust, etc.) require parents permission forms??</p>

<p>my middle school daughter read IMO quite controversial books that I did not receive information about( including one about cutting which affected her negatively)
I think that when she watched a movie on birth, parents were told that if they didn’t want them to view the movie to let the school know, but I don’t remember being asked regarding other strong topics.
SHe did go visit the Holocaust museum with her middle school class last year, although the holocaust hadn’t been studied to any depth IMO
I would have prefered that they gave them more preperation beforehand, but I relied on the parent chaperones to hold discussions afterward.</p>

<p>When my grandmother was fresh out of Smith College in 1913, she taught English and Latin at an all girls’ prep school…(her alma mater)…She wanted her students to read The Grapes of Wrath, and there was an uproar from the parents regarding it’s “inappropriateness”…fast forward to the same school, 1969, when I was assigned to read “Manchild in the Promised Land”…my mother nearly blew a gasket!</p>

<p>No wonder that the test scores in Kansas relative to the United States are so low.</p>

<p>I believe South Carolina currently holds the honor of lowest test scores.</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34001-2005Jan24.html[/url]”>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34001-2005Jan24.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>This article is in today’s Washington Post. It is about a woman from Maryland who objected to her freshman daughter reading “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings”.</p>

<p>most people don’t understand maya angelou…they read the rape scene and are not mature enough to look past the literal context. i personally thought the passage was gross too, but i was able to find a much deeper meaning.</p>

<p>and if anyone is being deprived of the opportunity to read Huck Finn, one should read it anyways. again, people spazz when they see the “N word” and other obscenities, but actually, huck finn is one of the most anti-discriminationatory (word? lol) novel since uncle tom’s cabin.</p>

<p>You have to register to read the article…</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Sorry about that! :o</p>

<p>Thanks for the C&P, yemaya. I think that there are certain books that there’s no harm in avoiding. Anything with graphic sexuality or sexual situations I think is a touchy subject, especially in a freshmen english class. In an AP class, the text can be more provocative, because the students allegedly are more mature, etc. I havn’t read “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” but if it truly does have graphic passages I don’t know how appropriate it is for a freshman english class. But, the district says it has alternate texts, so I don’t see how they are at fault.</p>