<p>This is ridiculous; you must have missed the three core contentions I made above. I never rejected the idea that someone with a 3.2, TAP certified or not TAP certified, can get into UCLA (your “actual students that attend UCLA” evidence). Here are my points:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Unquestionably, you and anyone else who disagrees with these, needs to provide evidence. The burden of proof is on you to show that TAP is more important than GPA, for instance, or to show how TAP changes the process overall. Otherwise, the evidence from the transfer profile is sufficient; also, if you provided evidence, I would do the work to get the quotes from the counselor sources I have discussed.</p>