<p>
</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Source, please?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>(Never claimed it wasn’t.) But there is absolutely no way for either of us to know since there is zero ways to measure ‘undergraduate programs’.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>A better question is why do you keep making up strawmen? Why do you keep changing words to make your points. Why do you keep inserting items and insisting that I defend them? (I would have thunk better of an Oxhridge alum.)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Why does it matter if you got in on the basis of geographic diversity (and $$)? The privates have been encouraging such diversity for years. But simple math indicates that more OOS’ers means less instaters. Thus, in the aggregate, OOS’ers have to be displacing instaters. UC readily concurs.</p>