<ol>
<li><p>Norcalguy, we’re talking pre-med, right? So you’re claim, number three, is that the average actual pre-med (those that actually start the sequence, as opposed to the more whimsical types) are better at Cornell than Berkeley? Is your evidence the admissions process and average stats of the whole student population? Or are you talking about in general? Could you clarify?</p></li>
<li><p>Does number four really matter? Is the group tha tyou saw representative of Cornell, and is what you imagine of Berkeley representative of it?</p></li>
<li><p>Some schools do screen their applicants. If someone claims this obviously they should provide evidence or explain what they mean. I mean, I could argue that Cornell does screen their applicants more based on the general admissions process, but I don’t think that’s what was claimed. Certainly the burden of proof is on the other claim and not you, but if you could provide anything that proves it wrong, all the easier.</p></li>
</ol>