<p>it depends. heres what i think. the best and worst looking females are white. so white women have more variegated looks. i find asian and latino women more slighty above average- good looking i dont find black women that attractive although there are some notable black women i would love to sleep with like</p>
<p>Folk wisdom and evolutionary biology would suggest white women. Sexual selection was the most likely driving force behind the varied phenotypic traits in Europe (re: white girls especially are the products of heavier sexual selection compared to Asians or blacks). </p>
<p>Asians as a whole, however, are more feminine, both guys and girls. So Asian girls have got that going for them in narrowing or perhaps eliminating the gap between them and white girls.</p>
<p>And to specify race, those mixed with European (Spanish/Portuguese), Indigenous (Natives of Latin America), and Black (the slaves) to produce the curvy, brown skinned, curly haired Latinas that many white men (and by white, I mean your typical white American) admire today.</p>
<p>What about models, like Iman, who have arose out of Africa?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Uhm – no. </p>
<p>Koreans are no better looking than other Asians (tho, they are generally taller, well in the South) and Asians aren’t better looking than any other race.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I guess Asians don’t have varied phenotypes – from variance in skin tone to variance in height of nose bridge to variances in eye shape and fold (some Asians have a double fold, some Asians have a single fold, some Asians have a hidden double fold, etc.)</p>
<p>They are more feminine overall (smaller stature, flatter faces <- yes that’s feminine, less prominent chins and nasal bridges, less prominent brows, larger upper lip, less deep set eyes). Although they do have a couple more masculine features (darker, more prominent jawline, larger eyebrows). Just not near enough to offset the more feminine one’s.</p>
<p>Would you like some more straw for those men? </p>
<p>Anyway, eye fold, skin tone, and nose bridge variations are present in Europeans. What are some traits that are more variable in Europeans than Asians that are readily noticeable? Hm. Maybe hair and eye color? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It’s quite transparent that you’re giving a sarcastic reply without evidence to try and discredit information that makes you uncomfortable for whatever reason. </p>
<p>On average, testosterone and estrogen levels are lowest and highest in Asians, respectively. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Fashion models are not automatically hot. Iman belongs in the not hot group. I didn’t even know who she was, but GoogleImages did the trick.</p>
<p>Smaller stature has to do w/ diet and standard of living.</p>
<p>I travelled to Africa - and at 6’1", I was a good 4-5" taller than the majority of African males (are they more feminine b/c they just happen to be shorter?).</p>
<p>Otoh, in Korea and Northern China - there are plenty of 6 footers.</p>
<p>Hmm - less prominent chins and nasal bridges? Well, blacks generally have those attributes as well.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Uhmm - no. The difference in color has to do w/ mutations which Africans or Mongoloids haven’t undergone, not sexual selection - and only in select parts of Europe (which is why one sees red heads in Northern Europe and not Southern Europe).</p>
<p>As for coloring - Asians have a much more variance in skin coloring than Europeans.</p>
<p>Yeah, blacks have those feminine traits. But they also have very pronounced maxillas and brow ridges and very sloped foreheads to offset them on the feminine/masculine scale. Some feminine traits that I forgot to mention about asians are less hair and higher eyebrows. Also I’m not just talking about height when talking about stature. But also about natural amount of muscle mass, width of shoulder girdle, etc.</p>
<p>Having a few feminine traits doesn’t automatically make blacks feminine since they have so many masculine one’s. What I’m saying is that asians have more feminine traits than any other race and less masculine one’s, making them the -most feminine-.</p>
<p>The asians born here are still shorter than the average white. So although diet might be a factor, genetics certainly are also.</p>
<p>I’m talking about NATURAL skin tone - not getting burnt to a crisp under some tanning bad.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It takes time for diet to have it’s impact (tho, a person may see a difference in a couple of inches).</p>
<p>For instance, the Dutch used to be among the shortest in Europe - now they are among the tallest.</p>
<p>Young males in South Korea average 5’9" in height - which is 4-5" taller than 3-4 decades ago.</p>
<p>And keep in mind - the vast majority of Asians in the US are from S Asia as opposed to N Asia.</p>
<p>There is a similar divide in height btwn N Europe and S Europe - tho, likely that has as much to do w/ standard of living and possibly types of cuisine than any genetic limitation.</p>
<p>As for “flatter-faces” - I’d hardly state that is a feminine feature (aside from the fact that certain Asian groups are known for having prominent cheekbones).</p>
<p>The idealized feminine facial feature is certainly not flat - having nice cheekbones is pretty much a must.</p>
<p>As for being hairy - I guess that must make the Arabs and Desis the most “masculine” - not to mention the Ainu and maybe the Mongols.</p>
<p>And there isn’t much of a difference in natural muscle mass (tho some blacks may have more fast-twitch muscle fibers).</p>
<p>Flatter faces are a more feminine feature. The reason for this is because in women the nasal bridge, maxilla, chin, brow all develop less. They also have less sloped foreheads. I never said that a flat face would be ideal on a woman, but a flatter face is more feminine. The ideal female face is certainly flatter than on the ideal man.</p>
<p>The only thing in females that develop forward more than in males are the cheekbones. Male cheekbones tend to grow down and in whereas female cheekbones tend to grow forward. </p>
<p>And being the hairiest doesn’t make you the most masculine. It’s just one trait. Although I would probably consider arabs the most masculine, everything considered.</p>
<p>And there is a difference in muscle mass. I’m a bodybuilder and I’ve read quite a few studies on genetic differences in muscle.</p>