<p>hawkette, how about posting the salary data, and if you happen to have, the top choices amongst the top employers that hire BBA graduates. Seriously, I think those are FAR more important information that posting SAT scores, especially that these top schools’ admission criteria vary widely. For example, large state universities don’t weigh SATs as their small private school peers do. Some schools don’t superscore SATs, and some schools, Berkeley for one, do not even accept students that are fresh from high schools and therefore do not count their SAT scores into their admission criteria. So, to rank schools based on SATs is utterly pointless. It does not picture the general teaching standard of the school. It does not say about the quality of what the school maintains. It does not say anything about their graduates’ desirability by employers. It does not say anything about their real success after acquiring their diploma. That’s why to place Washington-Olin ahead of MIT-Sloan is a big joke for me. I bet even the least informed employer wouldn’t rate Washinton-Olin higher than MIT-Sloan. In the same manner that USC-Marshall couldn’t be superior to Berkeley-Haas despite that USC-Marshall has a higher average SAT scores than Berkeley-Haas does. </p>
<p>
Thank you; that were exactly my point to the poster who’s selling McIntire on this thread. Even though McIntire graduates are more represented in WS than Berkeley graduates are, it does not mean that McIntire grads are more favored than Berkeley grads are in WS. They’re just more represented in WS because of their school location or proximity to WS. But as to their “sought-after-ness” in WS, they couldn’t really claim that.</p>