<p>
</p>
<p>I agree; but I would bet that most employers don’t base their recruitment on the applicant’s SAT scores. SAT scores don’t supersede the value of a BBA especially when this is acquired with honors. </p>
<p>My point, hawkette, is that you should not have included Berkeley-Haas in your list or ranking if you wish that ranking would reflect the general intellectual capacity of the students, because, like I’ve repeatedly said, Berkeley-Haas does not look into the applicant’s SAT scores. Berkeley-Haas only look at the GPA of the prereqs of the applicants. And mind you, these are way more difficult subjects to pass let alone pass those with flying colors, which Berkeley-Haas requires from all their students. </p>
<p>Here’s a simpler way to explain this:</p>
<p>Student A got an almost perfect SAT scores of 2400, applied to Berkeley and got admitted, but after two years of doing the Haas prerequisites, did not manage get a 3.4 GPA. </p>
<p>Student B got a cumulative SAT scores of 2100, got into Berkeley, but after two years in Berkeley, he’s managed to obtain a GPA of 3.8. </p>
<p>Who do you think will Haas absorb for their BBA intake? </p>
<p>Now, if you will answer “Student B”, which we both know that he’s the guy Haas will accept eventually, then my point that SAT scores for Haas is almost useless… is true, and therefore, should not be included in your ranking. </p>
<p>There are tremendous amount of knowledge one can gain during the first two years in college, and that should not be overlooked in favor of just one half-day exam.</p>