<p>the question was like…which of the following can you infer from the two charts</p>
<p>choices were like a) number not affect by something of coniferous trees
b) number of white pine? not much affected by removal of deciduous trees
c) speciation of pine not affected by removal of other trees
etc</p>
<p>wait…why was the cell cycle 40 hours and not 20? after 20 hours the population would double…at least that’s what i saw on the graph…</p>
<p>Every single interval was forty hours.</p>
<p>at zero it was 300,000 and at 40 hrs wasn’t it 600,000?</p>
<p>yeah, it was definitely 40</p>
<p>indian…
i don’t think you included the recombination one</p>
<p>ugh…i swear i remember seeing 20 hour intervals on the x axis…i don’t know how i screwed that up…</p>
<p>why is there usually a larger curve on the E section if M is supposed to be harder? (even though i find M to be much easier)
sorry for repeating questions but no one answered before</p>
<p>killaerone, I THINK I DID PUT THAT, wanna fight?? =P lol jp, yeah i just added it, thanks</p>
<p>hahha anyone??
the question was like…which of the following can you infer from the two charts</p>
<p>choices were like a) number not affect by something of coniferous trees
b) number of white pine? not much affected by removal of deciduous trees
c) speciation of pine not affected by removal of other trees
etc
i put b</p>
<p>yeah, the answer is a, the number wasnt affected by removing it, cuz if u remember, each of the different amount of trees where the same in plot 1 and 2 for that particulary tree, even though the coniferous trees were removed in plot 2</p>
<p>yeah i believe it was b as well
obviously, the conifers weren’t removed, that eliminates choice a
and…i’m not sure that’s what choice c was, but i remembe eliminating it : )</p>
<p>but they said…number of pines not just white pines. there was a new species of pines alogn with it… so that increased the number of pines</p>
<p>what about the one with which graph is not appropriate
i put the pie chart because it doesnt make sense to graph things that are independent from each other out of a single 100% (i.e. a pie)</p>
<p>it was the graph without the “no nutrients” data graphed, the answer was A, it was a bar graph that had nitrogen only, phosphorus only, and nitro + phos, but it didnt contain the control group “no nutrients added”, unlike all the other graphs</p>
<p>it was the bar graph without the control, choice a
or at least thats what i put</p>
<p>What did the other graphs look like?</p>
<p>that makes sense skeees, but i think it was the one that looked like a curve with the points labeled right in the middle of the graph. do you know which one i’m talking about? it didn’t make any sense because the tree species were all shoved into one line…and the points were oddly labeled inside the graph. maybe? i’m not very confident on this one</p>
<p>lol indian… nice complete list</p>
<p>there was some kind of plot, bar, pie, and two more… but it was definately choice A (the one w/o “no nutrients”)</p>
<p>what about the weird one i was talking about though? i mean…it doesn’t make sense to have all the trees–separate data–as points on a curve on the x axis…</p>