<p>All three certainly ARE great schools. No question about that. But I wonder how the Associated Content reporter decided on these three? A cursory perusal of the article doesn’t include his methodology. Associated Content apparently is a “platform that enables everyone to publish (his) content in any forum on any topic” and distribute it. It says on their website that they are supported by “ad-related content.” So it stands to reason that the “methodology” used by the reporter was advertising. (Kimoki, please know I am not taking issue with <em>you</em> and certainly think the link is worth passing along to forum members. It is just that I am just naturally skeptical when people start ranking MT or theater programs – or any other programs, for that matter – in such a definite way. Since I have been on this forum, doing so has been a recipe for, at best, debate and, at worst, outright hostility. :)) So it behooves all of us, as consumers of information, to know the source and to weigh this information with all the other info we have.</p>