Too bad she seems smart and could be an asset to any University I bet, but she seems to come unhinged quite easily, not appropriate for intellectual discussions in an open classroom that would encourage educated discourse.
I would discount the charges during her youth (over 10 years ago) her motives are understandable and forgivable ( and the courts decided to drop the greater charges which means she is innocent, sorry for all the haters)
Any professor worth their weight would be able to make her point without shouting or discounting another’s beliefs or understanding about circumstances that are not hers.
I true intelligent educator would have been able to bring the person around to her point ( or at least consider it) by at least considering the other’s POV.
How can she be effecitve if she discounts challenging points of view with out actually challenging them.
Hopefully before the U gives her tenure they see a different side of her.