The Girl Scouts and Boy Scouts organizations both have plenty to like and plenty to dislike, and there is so much variation across troops and across different levels of organization (national, state, local councils, individual troops). I think providing more options for girls who are not satisfied with GS is a good thing, and if GSUSA is so unhappy about it, they should take a look at why these girls are not interested in the programs they offer.
My experience with the GS included 2 years of participation with a local troop and 10+ years at a wonderful, rustic camp, where outdoor activities were central. I hated my experience with the local troop, which like many others described here focused on things like cookies and fashion shows. But I loved, loved, loved my Girl Scout camp, consider it a huge part of making me who I am today, and I would never trade it for a fancier or co-ed camp experience.
Overall, I’ve been disappointed in GSUSA in recent years because no other organization has quite the reach they have to bring outdoor experiences to girls, but they are closing camps left and right. Our local CEO argued that they should close our camp because girls weren’t interested in a place without boys and cell phones and computers (to an audience of girls who loved just that). I recently was perusing the GS badge website to learn about the new STEM and outdoor badges, and while it was cool to see those, looking at the badges as a whole made me feel like I was walking in the pink aisle at the toy store. If you are an organization for girls, to what extent do you cater to what you think girls want (and what many girls do want) versus offering opportunities for girls to be pushed outside their comfort zone and discover new interests? I don’t know the answer to that, but there are clearly many girls who are not satisfied with the Girl Scouts programming available to them.
I’m disheartened (really, kind of disgusted) by the posters here and elsewhere who claim that girls can’t handle the programming in Boy Scouts or that girls should just take what they’ve been offered in Girl Scouts. Many women hike and backpack and do all kinds of physically difficult things. I also know of at least one Girl Scout camp that is entirely focused on backpacking. As for the value of single-gender environments, women’s colleges (and a few men’s) still have a role to play and many women seek those out and have great experiences there. Most elite colleges were all male until relatively recently, too. Do you also think they should not have gone co-ed?
I have also led wilderness trips for teenagers, at GS camp and elsewhere, co-ed and single gender, for as long as a week. I’ve had all-girls trips where they just wanted to read magazines and where a kid freaked when her shoes got wet. But I also had all-boys trips where the kids just wanted to play Magic the Gathering. And gung ho groups of boys and girls. My favorite trip ever, though, was a week long co-ed trip. The hormones were fine.
By the way, nobody should be backpacking with a 50 lb pack, no matter their gender. If your pack is that heavy you are carrying something unnecessary. My pack for a week with food and water weighs 25-30 lb.