<p><a href=“%5Burl=http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059762426-post120.html]#120[/url]”>quote</a> Exactly what do you think it “proves?”
[/quote]
</p>
<p>The [assertion[/url</a>] that:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>is a **[url=<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability]falsifiable[/url][/b”>Falsifiability - Wikipedia]falsifiable](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059751089-post91.html]assertion[/url”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059751089-post91.html)[/b</a>] assertion. (The emphasis on ‘All’ was in the original post/assertion.) </p>
<p>*All<a href=“pun%20intended”>/i</a> it takes to disprove this assertion is to show that someone at the lower and middle class level had a net benifit over the last thirty years. </p>
<p>[Jack</a> Levis<a href=“an%20individual%20that%20went%20from%20package-sorter%20to%20Director%20of%20Package%20Process%20Management%20in%2030%20years”>/url</a>, and all the millions of individuals like Jack Levis in our economy, directly disprove the “All of it goes upstairs” assertion. </p>
<p>Furthermore, Mr. Levis’ story also supports the [url=<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059749348-post90.html]original”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059749348-post90.html]original</a> assertion](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059762332-post119.html]Jack”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059762332-post119.html) that the observable wealth concentrations we find across our society are attributable to wealth creation through [productivity</a> improvements](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059749348-post90.html]productivity”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059749348-post90.html) and not wealth redistribution. The compensation and wealth accumulation Mr. Levis has experienced over the last 30 years are directly related to his efforts to make UPS more productive.</p>
<p>Be it the disproved [“basic</a> truths”](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059752116-post100.html]"basic”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059752116-post100.html) argument or the disproved [“none</a> of the net benefit stays at the lower and middle class”](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059762332-post119.html]"none”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059762332-post119.html) argument, the [advocacy</a> for wealth redistribution](<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059746743-post72.html]advocacy”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1059746743-post72.html) sits on a logical foundation of sand.</p>