<p>“Be it the disproved “basic truths” argument or the disproved “none of the net benefit stays at the lower and middle class” argument, the advocacy for wealth redistribution sits on a logical foundation of sand.”</p>
<p>No, it doesn’t but nice try.</p>
<p>"The assertion that:</p>
<p>Quote:
…for thirty years, none of the net benefit stays at the lower and middle class level. All of it goes upstairs. </p>
<p>is a falsifiable assertion. (The emphasis on ‘All’ was in the original post/assertion.) </p>
<p>All (pun intended) it takes to disprove this assertion is to show that someone at the lower and middle class level had a net benifit over the last thirty years.</p>
<p>Jack Levis (an individual that went from package-sorter to Director of Package Process Management in 30 years), and all the millions of individuals like Jack Levis in our economy, directly disprove the “All of it goes upstairs” assertion." </p>
<p>Oh… and your argument in post #122 isn’t correct either. </p>
<p>Think about it.</p>