Bush wants schools to teach intelligent design.

<p>C.K.'s a great man. Did you ever think that maybe you’e the idiot?</p>

<p>Any time scourging the net for his better columns would take time away from CC- do you have any links to your favorites?</p>

<p>EK4: you have a quotation there (apparently from someone else) that appears to be directed at me–was there a post deleted in there that accused me of being an idiot for having said that I thought Charles Krauthammer’s column on evolution was a good one?</p>

<p>oh yeah- well the moderators apparently decided that they didn’t like the post- and deleted it- thats weird cause now mine doesn’t make any sense-
Since most of the columns that I found by CK made him sound like an idiot- I was thinking that there must be * something * that the other poster liked about him- so I was trying to give him benefit of doubt-</p>

<p>several of the neocons seem to have come out against teaching ID in a biology class- ( or frankly at all) which is interesting.
But the liberals sure aren’t all on the same page- so why should anyone else be?</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/opinion/19sat4.html[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/19/opinion/19sat4.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Article on Darwin in NYTimes. FYI</p>

<p>Is California discriminating by refusing to accept certain Christian courses as evidence of meeting course requirements? The Bob Jone’s Textbook states that it puts God before science. Does that mean the education is inferior?</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/national/20christian.html[/url]”>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/national/20christian.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Could the Ivys or top fifty start to refuse all of Kansas’s graduates based upon inferior science training? Should they?</p>

<p>It might make a statement…</p>