<p>While I’ve no doubt about UR’s undergrad biz program being fine, while many may appreciate the Goldman tie, my own thought is that it speaks far more to the UR alum’s placement and company clout than it does of the quality of UR undergrads. UNLESS … there is some unique factor to the curriculum at UR that would make yours unduly attractive? </p>
<p>But generally these types of observations are not too important or meaningful in suggesting the type and quality of undergrad experience one might have.</p>
<p>Still, it’s better having such good fortune and well placed, interested, and loyal alums than not. </p>
<p>To that point, and I’m not trying to be difficult or obstreperous in posing this …</p>
<p>What is the logical explanation for UR’s poor showing in alumni giving? I’ve my own speculative notion, but it’s not informed. Can any lend some genuine, candid insight to this minor mystery?</p>