<p>Alright, so you’ve basically changed your entire argument; before, you were saying that Gladwell’s conclusions were valid, and now, you’re concentrating on the Honor Code. </p>
<p>Frankly, I don’t understand any legitimate reason for this new position any more than your last; MIT and Ivies have people living in dormitories whose social structure is roughly similar to that of a Caltech House, with comparable numbers of residents. </p>
<p>Why should it be any different, then? </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And they’re absolutely correct…but what does it have to do with the rule of 150 or the Honor Code?</p>