Excellent, MomofJandL.
The thing about tax implications of a trad IRA vs Roth is that, either way, the dollar amount from income is “tax liable,” it’s a question of when you pay that tax. Now or in 35-40 years.
Skip the health uncertainty, for a moment. With a trad IRA, you get to deduct the amount you deposited, from gross income, on the current tax year . As she says, if your tax level is 15%, depositing 2k today saves you $300 in taxes for 2017. But when you take it out, if your income then is much higher, if you are in a higher tax bracket, your tax bite is correspondingly larger.
With a Roth, you deposit “after tax” dollars. You pay taxes on all your income for 2017 (minus whatever ordinary deductions apply,) then take 2k out of your pocket and deposit in a Roth. So you paid that $300 bite on the 2k, but that tax is done, finito, paid.
In general, today, this is why younger folks are steered toward a Roth. Usually, they are in a lower tax bracket than they will be, after 59.5. Pay lower taxes today, rather than possibly higher taxes later. Same basic sorts of investment choices and risks.
And when you set up an IRA, of either type, you get info on the investment types, current returns (growth,) and usually at least a 5-year look-back. You also get some categorical info: high-risk, moderate, and lower risk. Sometimes, it’s easy to just choose moderate risk. If you lose money one year, in general, it should make up, as time goes by.
And, if you have an employer match, for every dollar you contribute, they match a portion.