<p>*casey’s story was that her boyfriend mentioned chloroform on his myspace and she then searched it.
*</p>
<p>The problem was the timing. The boyfriend did the chloroform post in January…and Casey looked it up months later.</p>
<p>*Had she been convicted, the verdict would have been overturned in any case, as the prosecutor withheld substantial exculpatory evidence. The jury got it right. *</p>
<p>If the verdict had been overturned…she would have been retried. That has NOTHING to do with “the jury got it right”. </p>
<p>*Father-of-four ‘stabs his wife and young children before torching their home’
Daily Mail
By Daily Mail Reporter A father-of-four is accused of stabbing his wife and four young children before setting fire to their house and killing all five victims. *</p>
<p>Oh my…another case of drownings made to look like murder.</p>
<p>If you merely disapprove then you aren’t vehemently railing against her.</p>
<p>But let’s not be coy… You think everyone in a riot goes out to start a riot? It’s called mob mentality and every human being succumbs to it. </p>
<p>Hatred is born from this type of anger and violence is born from hatred and it happens every day. </p>
<p>Hence 2000 posts here, MULTIPLE find Casey Facebook pages and all other manner of issues. Who wants to lay down money that 90%of the people involved in the Facebook nonsense are hard working, church going, parents…</p>
<p>Human behavior is predictable… Just because you think you won’t do something doesn’t mean 99 others won’t.</p>
<p>mom2ck… i dont have an idea of the timing…i only saw the closing arguments…i was just observing that the prosecutor did have an error and the times i did watch nancy grace it was a mantra of…totmom searched the internet 84 times!!! when in fact she didnt.</p>
<p>If you really want to get into the statistics of who is responsible for deaths of children, here is a start from government sources. BTW–for children under 5 the mother is the sole perpetrator 27% of the time and in tandem with others over 50% of the time. Mom is some or a part of the cause of death over 75% of the time.</p>
<p>Oh really – weren’t you and jsanche32 the ones arguing that Human Behavior is NOT predictable - that we can’t make any connection with the partying lifestyle of Casey Anthony immediately after the death of her child.</p>
<p>Or is it only predictable when it’s convenient in your argument.</p>
<p>Here is woman who hit a homeless man with her car then let him die stuck in the grill of her car in her garage over the next couple of days. Afterwards she and friends dumped the body in a park. </p>
<p>Quote:
[Casey’s defense atty] couldn’t bring herself to say, “yes, I would trust her with my kids (grandkids)”…gee, what a surprise.</p>
<p>========================</p>
<h1>I know a lot of people I wouldn’t trust to babysit my kids if I had any. And as far as I know, they’ve never been accused of hurting anybody! </h1>
<p>That’s not the point. </p>
<p>Do you know moms that you have declared to be “great and devoted moms” and you have declared that they would never neglect, hurt, etc, a child, but you wouldn’t let them babysit your kids? I sure don’t. THOSE are the moms I WOULD have babysit my kids! Those are the moms that I recommend to others if they need someone to watch their kids. </p>
<p>I don’t recall ever saying that. In fact, the various types of grief, for those that have experienced it and or studied it read like a list of symptoms. The only time unpredictability comes into play is which “symptoms” are expressed. </p>
<p>If you are going to quote me at least get it right…</p>
<p>Are you saying that mob mentality DOESN’T exist? Are you claiming that the hundreds and thousands of people filling these Facebook groups are psychotic or something?</p>
<p>You overestimate your fellow man. How do you think most lynchings started? The holocaust?</p>
<p>Why exactly do suspects routinely get put into bullet proof vests??? The police and FBI must be overreacting…</p>
<p>"What do you think the majority of the people here are doing? Virtual lynch mob… "</p>
<p>I don’t do Facebook - so I can’t even answer to what’s going on there - but I just don’t see a majority of people here acting or sounding like a lynch mob. There have been some comments, but not by the majority of the commenters.</p>
<p>"Why are you surprised? Look at the vehemence being espoused here. You really think the majority of people here railing against Casey don’t feel that way??? "</p>
<p>Majority of the people here railing against Casey… NOT the majority of the people here or the majority against Casey…</p>
<p>Railing:Complain or protest strongly and persistently about</p>
<p>There are a couple still actively posting in here that fit that description nicely.</p>
<p>Sigh… That was built of my previous statement. I’m sorry… I will lay out everything in extremely great detail from now on so that you can keep up…</p>
<p>But, if you want to get technical… You are quite wrong. Look back through the entire thread…</p>
<p>The majority of people WERE railing against her and NOW they claim no wishes of ill will after the Facebook groups popped up. Only a few like Soozie actually stated that they did not wish ill before this topic came up.</p>
<p>Quite easy AND convenient. I recall reading statements from Germans post WW2 stating they never thought it would go so far. </p>
<p>xSlacker, just can the snark. People who cannot express themselves clearly–“built of my previous statement”? In what universe is that a grammatically-correct phrase?–should not presume to condescend to others.</p>
<p>Failure of a prosecutor to disclose exculpatory evidence in a potentially capital case is a very serious offense. In some states, it is grounds for disbarment (perhaps that is why the prosecutor in this case “retirement”), and the prosecutor can be held personally liable for the entire costs of the criminal proceeding,</p>
<p>I quoted you directly. If you didn’t mean it, you shouldn’t have said it. When you found that–according to your back-pedaling, anyway–your intent was “misinterpreted” because you contradicted yourself, the proper response would have been to clarify, not accuse others of being unable to read.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should read it again because I didn’t accuse anyone of anything nor did I contradict myself. ;)</p>
<p>My intent was quite plain. You choosing to cherry pick it is not my problem. Even if it appeared to be a contradiction your assumption should have been that I intended to follow the path I was on. That’s just common sense. </p>
<p>You, however, are free to infer whatever you want but your inference is not my responsibility. The proper course would have been to read it right the first time, then if in doubt ask, but not to attack because in the real world people attack back. </p>
<p>You know… The whole “snark” thing. ;)</p>
<p>But that is all beside the point… It’s hypocritical to decry condescension and then condescend. It’s also hypocritical to say you wish no ill will or violence against Casey Anthony and then say you want her to have a “long, hard life…”</p>
<p>Xslacker - you are confusing who you are arguing with.</p>
<p>And I didn’t say ill will - I said harm - there’a a BIG difference.</p>
<p>“I know for myself and a lot of others here that have stated that they believe that Casey had something to do with Caylees death that they also would not want any harm to come to Casey because of the verdict. I also, however, do not wish her a charmed, wealthy, care-free life either. I dont like her and I wish her a long, hard road and thats it.”</p>