<p>Baez is pathetic. He cannot phrase a question if it involves more than one fact. God help him with hypotheticals. He figures out how to rephrase the question based on the prosecutor’s objections. When I watch, I find myself shouting the proper phrasing to the television.</p>
<p>CNN’s Gary Tuchman :<br>
Do G and C hope Casey is found not guilty?</p>
<p>Mark Lippman: (their atty)
No. They want to see the truth. They want to see justice. They do not think she’s innocent."</p>
<p>I think Baez over-played his hand when he pulled out the “George was there and helped dispose of the body” story. That just sealed the deal with the Ants that Casey is guilty since they know that isn’t true. </p>
<p>And…think about it…The Ants believed the Nanny story and were only told that that was a lie a few weeks ago. So, they had to sit thru all those replaying of the jailhouse videos with that new information. I can’t imagine what went on in their heads while those were replayed…hearing from Casey words that they now know were absolute lies and BS.</p>
<p>Someone made a good point yesterday. When did Baez come up with the “drowning story”??? Up until Caylee’s body was found, Baez was making PUBLIC statements that Caylee was alive and MISSING. There is a tape of him saying that in October when Casey was charged with murder. And, he said it AGAIN, to a court, the morning the body was found in December. The body was found literally an hour or so after he was in court saying that Caylee was not dead, but was missing.</p>
<p>Supposedly there is some kind of computer forensics for the day that Caylee died that will indicate that the “story” isn’t true. Don’t know what that is.</p>
<p>So many credibility issues.</p>
<p>I hope they disbar Baez, he has made a mockery of the trial, and even though I believe Casey is guilty, she has not had the best legal representation. He is either brilliantly playing with the court to make so many bizarre statements that the jury will declar a mistrial or he is really stupid.</p>
<p>Only two women have ever been executed in Florida: Judias Buenoano in 1998; Aileen Wuornos in 2002. The roofer that reroofed my family’s house a few years ago, one of his helpers said he dated Wournos for a few months after he met her in a bar–I think he is still shaking. Wournos was a serial killer!</p>
<p>[Women</a> on Death Row - Florida Department of Corrections](<a href=“http://www.dc.state.fl.us/oth/deathrow/women.html]Women”>http://www.dc.state.fl.us/oth/deathrow/women.html)</p>
<p>^^^
She was the subject of the movie “Monster” a few years ago. An excellent movie about a very, very complex woman and the life events that made her what she was. Very hard to watch, though.</p>
<p>I do not think she’ll get the DP. No way.</p>
<p>And, during the penalty phase - if it gets to that point - her parents will plead for her life. </p>
<p>That said, I can’t imagine what Cindy and George are now thinking now that they know that their D killed their beloved GD.</p>
<p>What do you make of the mom claiming that the internet searches were hers? Hogwash!</p>
<p>Cindy trying to keep her daughter from getting the death penalty…
so she says she did the Google searches and was home when her time card says she was at work.
The Anthonys are one messed up family.</p>
<p>I was shocked when I read that Cindy said the internet searches were done by her, my first thought was ‘She’s lying!’, but I wonder what the jury thinks of this?</p>
<p>Lies and more lies. Oh what a tangled web we weave…</p>
<p>Someone searched “How to make chloroform” 84 times on the family Anthony computer plus the one search for chloroform in March 2008 that Cindy took ownership of…</p>
<p>Well, if I was a juror and a parent I would think that she, like most any parent, would do anything to save her child’s life. Watching her, though…she is a good liar. It must be genetic.</p>
<p>If I were on the jury and I thought Cindy was lying, I would see as more evidence that Casey if guilty. She wouldn’t lie unless she thought Casey was guilty. Who better to judge Casey’s guilt than her mother. She is basically telling the jury that her daughter is guilty.</p>
<p>^^^
I agree with that. The more the defense does, the more it falls apart. Chloroform, chlorphyl…sleepy dog…87 hits on a website on how to MAKE chloroform? 87? Really? She’s a nurse and she’s looking up chest trauma on the internet?</p>
<p>I was on a jury once for a teen who committed a rather petty crime. It occurred after a party. The defense asked the teen if there was any drinking or drugs at the party and he said “No”. After that I just dismissed everything the defense and defendant said because it was such an obvious lie. What teen, unsupervised party doesn’t have alcohol and/or drugs? Once I knew he would lie on the stand, I didn’t buy anything.</p>
<p>In light of today’s testimony by Cindy and Lee, is anyone else creeped out that Caylee’s name is a combo of Casey and Lee?</p>
<p>^^^
My husband mentioned that was odd, too. I can’t find it on TV today. I must be looking on the wrong channels. What network is it?</p>
<p>hln, in my area;
i’m watching it now</p>
<p>I definitly think Cindy is lying to protect her dtr.</p>
<p>I watched some excerpts from today’s proceedings on Headline News tonight. I did think it was kind of weirdnot totally incomprehensible, but kind of weirdwhen Lee was sobbing on the stand when he talked about how his family wouldn’t admit to him that Casey was pregnant and that he refused to visit her in the hospital when she had Caylee. I mean, I can understand his feeling wigged out or ****ed off or betrayed, but really? Sobbing about it five years later? I think they are a truly broken family, completely dysfunctional.</p>
<p>I saw that also. The news pundits felt there was something deeper to all that, a broken family, but something more that we may never find out about. It was painful to watch him sobbing.</p>