<p>Ablow has suggested that President Barack Obama’s appearances on “YouTube and the daytime talk shows” may have contributed to an increase in suicide rates. [12]</p>
<p>Ablow has stated that policies like health care reform in the United States “sow the seeds” of the “kind of oppression” seen in Egypt. [13]</p>
<p>Ablow has stated that “Lots of species may be about to leave the planet, and I don’t care.” [14]</p>
<p>Ablow has stated that participants in the 2011 Wisconsin protests against weakening and possibly abolishing collective bargaining rights for civil service employees are “Parasitic and need to be identified as such.” [15]</p>
<p>Ablow has stated that a complaint filed by the National Labor Relations Board against the Boeing Company, for the company’s alleged retaliation against unionized workers represents “the end of freedom in America.” [16]</p>
<p>Ablow has falsely suggested that there is “no evidence” linking asthma to the burning of fossil fuel. [17]</p>
<p>Ablow has claimed that President Barack Obama pursues “a socialist or communist manifesto.” [18]</p>
<p>Yep, yet another Fox News low life crackpot.</p>
<p>Maybe we should give him a break. His last name is “Ablow.” Do you think his name was written anywhere from elementary school through high school without another word written after it?</p>
<p>Ablow may be interesting to read since he was willing to conceive of sexual abuse of Casey by George as explaning both Casey’s conduct and George’s suicide attempt. </p>
<p>This is the first time I’ve heard anyone speculate that George killed Cayley while trying to rape her. Ablow is a real piece of work. Actually, it’s possible that Ablow himself killed Cayley while performing a wild satanic ritual. Im not saying that anything really happened this way, but it could have. Really.</p>
<p>I do find those ideas that Ablow mentions really “wow,” as anyone can speculate a million stories of what could have really happened and with NO basis at all. I mean if there were even SOME evidence of the story Ablow tells, I would weigh if it was plausible but there is none and anyone can make up all sorts of stories. At least the story whereby Casey either accidentally or intentionally kills her child has SOME basis (not necessarily enough to prove it in a court of law) to be plausible. There is at least SOME evidence, even if not enough to prove it 100% without a doubt. The defense’s pool/George story or now Ablow’s story of George murdering Caylee are fanciful stories with no basis whatsoever to go along with them.</p>
<p>This whole nonsense that George killed Caylee is nuts.</p>
<p>If so, then why would Casey make up a story about the nanny? She would just say that she has no idea of what happened to Caylee…because she wouldn’t have known.</p>
<p>mom2…re: post 1747…right…if George actually murdered Caylee, why would Casey not be looking for her and why would she need to make up cover up stories about a nanny, or a pool accident, etc.? Why would she take the fall for something she wasn’t involved in at all? She would be trying to help the investigators to help find her child and find her child’s killer. She surely wouldn’t be protecting her dad and taking the fall and the death penalty for something she had nothing remotely to do with.</p>
<p>And frankly, I can’t imagine a father, if he was indeed the one who killed Caylee, allowing his daughter, Casey, to take the fall and death penalty for something he did. </p>
<p>NONE of that story is plausible, not to mention not a shred of evidence to give any consideration of these tales. </p>
<p>At least the Casey accidentally or intentionally killing her child story, has SOME basis, even if not 100% proof. There is circumstantial evidence that fits, enough so to make it plausible and enough so that even jurors are saying they don’t think she is innocent in some type of involvement in the death of her child.</p>
<p>And that’s why when the jury foreperson said he and others on the jury believed it was possible that George killed Caylee, I just shook my head and rolled my eyes. Anyone with an IQ over a peanut would have been able to figure out that George did not kill Caylee.</p>
<p>The DailyMail, i can’t post the link, has a story that the judge “is just as much of a liar as Casey”. A woman claims she has had an affair with him for 7 years.</p>
<p>Baez himself doesn’t have a squeaky clean background. In common with Casey, he was parent as a teen. He was denied admission to the bar for 8 years. He became a deadbeat dead due to failure to pay child support. He declared bankruptcy. He defaulted on student loans. He wrote bad checks. He wasn’t allowed at one time to practice law due to a court decision:</p>
<p>And oy vey, I just read elsewhere that my own daughter’s talent agency that represents her had signed a contract to represent Baez and then immediately unsigned him due to a backlash of criticism.</p>
<p>It wasn’t even the mistress herself who came forward–it was “a source close to alleged mistress Janis Williamson.” Even people several degrees of separation away from the Anthony case are trying to grab their 15 minutes.</p>
<p>I don’t care if the judge, George, Baez or whover had affairs…heck, I don’t care if they all were swingers with each other and the same gals…that is irrelevant.</p>
<p>Personally, I am disgusted that some on the jury felt that George may have killed Caylee. Only those with little-to-no-critical thinking skills could harbor that possibility.</p>
<p>It disgusts me that they absolutely could not go over testimony to hone in on a realistic verdict. They asked for nothing, which leads me to believe that they made up their minds way before deliberations. It was shear laziness. The audacity to shift the blame from Casey to George, making her the victim. All the while Caylee was the victim.
If they were all sickened by the verdict that they were going to render, why didn’t they comb over testimony and evidence to verify what they knew In their guts to be true. Sham less and lazy. And yes Casey did it and she did it alone. OK I’m waiting for the lawyers to call, too.</p>
<p>What seems odd is that while we haven’t heard from each juror, the jury forman implies that the jury as a group seemed to think George had something to do with Caylee’s death and even taking a group of people such as this thread, I don’t think we’d come up with even 50% who believe George was involved in Caylee’s death. But the forman made it sound like that was the thinking of most of the jury and not just that George was involved in the cover up but was actually involved in the child’s death. I understand if some thought that since some might believe the story Baez gave, but I can’t imagine the majority thinking that since I don’t see that as what the majority of others outside the jury seem to think and in fact, the jury’s thinking (according to the forman) suspects George was involved in a much bigger way,such as the child’s actual death itself.</p>
<p>To clarify, I am not talking of the jury’s VERDICT on the charges against Casey, but just about their thinking that George did it.</p>
<p>They thought George did it just on conjecture and speculation, no proof or evidence whatsoever, yet they couldn’t even connect a dot to Casey. It doesn’t make any sense. Just lazy and not willing to do the work asked of them.</p>