I think and hope OP has a good shot at a number of schools including Wellesley, Smith, Bryn Mawr, and Mt. Holyoke, but based on our very recent experience, I would caution against thinking of some of these as safeties. It’s important to keep in mind that there may be need-aware admissions (and sometimes yield protection in admissions) at the schools that tend to be categorized as matches for certain applicants (Mt. Holyoke and Bryn Mawr for example). That is, on an academic and extracurricular basis they may seem more like match or maybe even somewhat likely schools, but other institutional priorities will likely factor into admissions decisions. Whereas Wellesley is need-blind in admissions, for example, Mt. Holyoke is not.
We categorized Wellesley as a reach (for all), Smith as a reasonable reach for my D23, Mt. Holyoke as a match veering into possibly more likely territory, and Bryn Mawr as a match. I believe we were mistaken due to not incorporating need aware admissions and possibly yield protection enough when looking at supposed match schools.
In my D23’s case, she was admitted to 3 of those 4 and the one she was not admitted to was Mt. Holyoke which on paper might have been the one we would have thought a strong candidate would be most likely to be admitted to. She demonstrated tons of interest including visiting campus from over 1000 miles away, interviewing, virtual sessions, etc. But her financial need was significant while not being significant enough to be in a low income category. Thus the college would be spending a lot of money on her but not addressing an institutional priority of serving a certain proportion of low income students. A mismatch for where they wanted to spend those dollars. We completely understand and support those priorities. We didn’t factor it in enough to our thinking about what schools were matches. For my D, she got into almost all of her reaches despite the fact most of them were reach-for-all schools (and need blind and not yield protecting as much as “match” schools), but she did not do nearly as well with the schools that were supposedly matches but that understandably are sensitive to institutional priorities around finances and yield. Her results were flipped from what one might predict if focusing on academics, extracurriculars, personal characteristics, etc.
In the OP’s case, this may not be an issue given the low income, and hopefully OP will get into Wellesley ED, but I wish for my D’s sake that we had thought more about some of those factors (D ended up with incredible options but some stress could have been minimized with fewer applications to “match” schools that were really, in hindsight, reaches for her due to those factors).
Best of luck to OP!