Change in Smith's Ranking on USNWR

<p>

</p>

<p>Yes, of course, a benefit to applicants is the primary reason colleges participate in The Common Data Set initiative as well as publish their data…but there’s another :)</p>

<p>What’s interesting, too, is that the CDS initiative is a collaborative effort.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[Common</a> Data Set (CDS) // Office of Strategic Planning & Institutional Research // University of Notre Dame](<a href=“http://ospir.nd.edu/institutional-research/common-data-set-cds/]Common”>http://ospir.nd.edu/institutional-research/common-data-set-cds/)</p>

<p>Reed doth protest too much, methinks. Cynically viewed, Reed’s decision to continually refuse to participate in USNWR rankings, and the subsequent well publicized ‘feud’, could be judged as a PR stroke of genius. The college has received national awareness and immeasurable free publicity, much to the benefit of the college.</p>

<p>Kidding aside, I have no doubt Reed’s refusal to participate in the USNWR rankings is based solely on a genuine belief the methodology is flawed and the rankings are of dubitable value.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Doug Christiansen, Vanderbilt’s dean of admissions, also has a reasonable argument against the peer assessment.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[NEWS:</a> Some colleges protest U.S. News ranking methods | InsideVandy](<a href=“http://www.insidevandy.com/drupal/node/4409]NEWS:”>http://www.insidevandy.com/drupal/node/4409)</p>