<p>Weinschenk had exams from the last year (2010) .I just used some of his and Soria’s tougher exams as practive for my grad. level because a surprising amount of special topics covered in either overlapped w/the stuff that we covered in bio-organic. Not to mention, both gave problem types that were similar to ones we had, especially for 222). I will put these below:
This was the year where he had a child, so the exam 2 and 3 are easier than normal. For some reason, the pattern continued this year. Again, they are challenging but my friend who took admitted that they were a bit easier than some of the pre-2010 back exams. Since I helped him, I can vouch for that opinion. I will not bother to post 221 material from Weinschenk because the material is generally the same though there is, like Soria’s class, variation in the “hard portion” of the exam in terms of the problem types (though the material emphasized is generally the same each year. Seems that Soria flip-flops more frequently).<br>
222 Exam 3:<a href=“https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BMjE2NGE2MDQtZmFjZC00ZDE5LWE4MDctZGIxMjQxYzJiZDA2&hl=en_US[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BMjE2NGE2MDQtZmFjZC00ZDE5LWE4MDctZGIxMjQxYzJiZDA2&hl=en_US</a>
222 Exam 2: <a href=“https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BMWJlZDdkZjAtNzZkNy00ZGIzLTljNjktM2Q4ODA4MDY2ODFj&hl=en_US[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BMWJlZDdkZjAtNzZkNy00ZGIzLTljNjktM2Q4ODA4MDY2ODFj&hl=en_US</a>
222 Exam 1: <a href=“https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BYWVlNGY0YzctZTA2Yy00OTk1LWIxMjktNzkzMTRkM2M4ZGY0&hl=en_US[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B456FmeCw42BYWVlNGY0YzctZTA2Yy00OTk1LWIxMjktNzkzMTRkM2M4ZGY0&hl=en_US</a>
If I find it, I’ll find Soria 222-Z exam 1 later. It’s very short and asks some kind of weird, but straightforward questions. The general problem w/Soria’s class is that many questions are pure curveballs. Normally in Weinschenk’s class, no matter how tough the material is, you have probably been exposed to the problem type. Soria makes you “think outside the box” or have an epiphany. Questions that would otherwise look really simple actually require lots of thought and then Soria grades harder. He gives lots of 0s for problems even if you attempt it. A fatal error in W’s class will get you say 2/6, in Soria 0/10 (he counts harder problems at a much higher percentage for some reason too). Both are great profs, but it really depends on the type of thinker you are.</p>