<p>
</p>
<p>Chemical engineering job prospects are inevitably tied to the health of the chemical industry overall, which has been in steep decline in the US. What does a major player like BASF have to say?</p>
<p>[BASF</a> Report 2009 - Trends in the chemical industry](<a href=“http://www.report.basf.com/2009/en/managementsanalysis/businessdevelopment/globaleconomy/chemicalindustry.html]BASF”>http://www.report.basf.com/2009/en/managementsanalysis/businessdevelopment/globaleconomy/chemicalindustry.html)</p>
<p>Even the vaunted (on these forums) BLS has a decline projected for chemical engineers:
[url=<a href=“http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm]Engineers[/url”>http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm]Engineers[/url</a>]</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And this is the part that gets continually swept under the rug by places like the BLS. More and more places continue to outsource or hire cheap foreign labor to come here and do science and engineering jobs. Petro chemicals will be healthy, but you don’t think that almost every single chemical engineering student out there currently has their sights set on the petro industry in order to find a decent job? Competition will be very tight. </p>
<p>Just because you have a $150,000 K degree from a US university doesn’t mean you are any more valuable than the one of the billion James Lee’s in China holding an engineering degree.</p>