<p>Byerly,</p>
<p>What is your point? </p>
<p>You open with a grand statement about yield and early action. Nowhere do I see any mention about the effect of early action on yield.</p>
<p>Then, you reference the “Early Admissions Game.” From your comments, I doubt you’ve actually read the book, as if you had, you would know it does not discuss programs like Chicago’s that are open and non-binding. </p>
<p>Then, you spout off on your suggested fixes. If you had ever been to the university, which I doubt, you might realize that Chicago isn’t New Haven, and that the areas around the University are pretty nice and getting better - a LOT better than New Haven, for one.</p>
<p>Then, when someone deals with actual data, not just links that don’t even support your point, you disparage them with rounding comments. </p>
<p>it seems to me you’re the one playing with numbers.</p>
<p>Please, Byerly, crawl back into your hole. You don’t like U of C? fine. Leave. Frankly, you are a bore.</p>