<p>Is there evidence to support high selectivity, low faculty-student ratios, increased per-student expenditures actually improve the quality undergraduate student education? Just because USNews says these objective indicators of a quality education does not provide validity to dubious data. </p>
<p>What worse is … “…Clemson is went from 38th best college in the country to the 22nd best without changing the faculty or the curriculum.”</p>
<p><a href=“http://blogs.indystar.com/education/2009/06/do_college_rank.html[/url]”>http://blogs.indystar.com/education/2009/06/do_college_rank.html</a></p>