<p>As long as the other “co-” people dont mind and u all agree not to put co-, there shouldnt be a problem. But it is REALLY important that all of the co-'s dont put co- because if one of the co-'s puts co- and the other co- doesnt put co- then it looks odd. How could there be a president and co-president… get it?</p>
<p>Columbia reviews applications from the same high school/area to compare how applicants made the best of their opportunities.</p>
<p>Clearly, this isn’t a black-and-white issue. If you feel that putting Co- would make you a more ethical and spiritually fulfilled person, go ahead and do it. If not, then don’t. If you just want to play it safe, but Co-. There’s no argument against it, just better argumings for nto putting Co- - but better arguments against it, too.</p>
<p>I don’t see how putting one over the other would make a difference. If anything, I think, co-president would certainly look better than president since it shows you have the ability to cooperate with other leaders and work together for a common purpose. Sheesh, don’t be a prestige hogger!</p>
<p>Nowadays, as everyone has leadership positions in hundreds of clubs, leadership in that sense is becoming less important. Unique leadership, leadership of a large club, or leadership of a competitive club(Prez of a varsity math team at a good school) is what they are looking for. Sorry but being prez of 10 clubs with names like assistive tech and james bond club don’t cut it.</p>